From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 17 01:46:39 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7240A106566C
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:46:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca
	[IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290078FC0C
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:46:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:808a:bf97:8eb:f23b]
	([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:808a:bf97:8eb:f23b])
	by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAH1kTDN075220
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:46:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-ID: <4CE333EF.10406@sentex.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:46:23 -0500
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
References: <20101115211350.GE2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<4CE1FDBA.9030403@sentex.net>
	<20101116094330.GH2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<4CE300DE.8010304@sentex.net>
	<20101116221926.GN2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20101116221926.GN2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Call for testers: FPU changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:46:39 -0000

On 11/16/2010 5:19 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Would your conclusion be that the patch seems to increase the throughput
> of the aesni(4) ?
> 
> I think that on small-sized blocks, when using aesni(4), the dominating
> factor is the copying/copyout of the data to/from the kernel address
> space. Still would be interesting to compare the full output
> of "openssl speed" on aesni(4) with and without the patch I posted.

Hi,
	There does seem to be some improvement on large blocks.  But there are
some freakishly fast times. On other sizes, there is no difference in
speed it would seem

I did 20 runs. Updated stats at http://www.tancsa.com/fpu.html

	---Mike