From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 6 16:59:27 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA25678 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 16:59:27 -0800 Received: from phoenix.net (gclarkii@phoenix.phoenix.net [199.3.232.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA25668 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 16:59:22 -0800 Received: (from gclarkii@localhost) by phoenix.net (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA23876 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Mar 1995 18:56:46 -0600 From: Gary Clark II Message-Id: <199503070056.SAA23876@ phoenix.net> Subject: VM86 stuff To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 6 Mar 1995 18:56:46 -0500 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 778 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I've been working on intergrating the work done on NetBSD to allow for VM86 mode. I've done ifdefs on every change so it should be none lethal (I hope...:)). I'm in the process of compiling a kernel right now and if there are no bombs in the compile and no panics on boot, I'll make a diff. The only problem is that my diff would be in relation to 2.0-RELEASE and not current (I've only got one machine now:(). Most likely there will be a bomb or a panic due to fact that a major portion of the interfaces have changed. (e.g. IDTVEC in exception.s instead of locore.s, different setup of struct and so on) After I've spent a little bit of time on this, I would like to get some help from the pros. Anyone who knows the kernel pretty well want to help out? Gary