From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 23 08:16:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4716916A556 for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 08:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@heidieker.de) Received: from wp045.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp045.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.132.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEF343D73 for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 08:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@heidieker.de) Received: by wp045.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.43 using esmtpa from i5387cb49.versanet.de ([83.135.203.73] helo=[192.168.42.9]) id 1FiS4V-0004q2-DO; Tue, 23 May 2006 10:16:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <44721E78.2050002@bitfreak.org> References: <1e4841eb0605211854i44c4aa4cm9dfc72506c2232ea@mail.gmail.com> <1e4841eb0605221133s428d9136p3d5f7eff964167f4@mail.gmail.com> <2B495EE0-9E81-4CDD-84AF-D3789C9FCB95@shire.net> <20060522195938.GA1267@freebie.xs4all.nl> <44721E78.2050002@bitfreak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lars Heidieker Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:16:52 +0200 To: Darren Pilgrim X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) Cc: Wilko Bulte , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD is now self-hosting on the UltraSPARC T1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 08:16:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22 May 2006, at 22:26, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Wilko Bulte wrote: >> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:43:11PM +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote.. >>>>>>> on topic, the Opterons aren't SMP either, and neither are the >>>> ht-Xeons... >>>>>> ... >>>>> The MultiProcessor Opterons are _NOT_ SMP, they are _NUMA_ >>>>> machines, >>> Not really related to the original topic any longer, is it? >> Decent bikesheds never are.. > > At least people are being polite and not messing up the threading > by changing the subject header. :) > Yes that would be extremely NUMA because of the latencies occurring with such a thread migration ;-) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEcsT1cxuYqjT7GRYRAhXZAJ9YGIW279AByboC9V4VRnYG78pprwCguRWR E9GIqAo+y9AeNulP2rMcX5o= =xW9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----