From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 16:19:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E1D37B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 16:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.181.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D438A43FB1; Thu, 8 May 2003 16:19:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@unixpages.org) Received: from gondor.middleearth (gondor.middleearth [192.168.1.42]) by haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E098C1DC; Fri, 9 May 2003 01:19:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by gondor.middleearth (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9C3E546D0; Fri, 9 May 2003 01:19:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 01:19:09 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer To: Tom Rhodes Message-ID: <20030508231909.GO609@unixpages.org> References: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8G1nIWD3RY794FAy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-PGP-Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D cc: FreeBSD-doc@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR: docs/37221 && docs/51886: mount_nfs(8) options. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 23:19:15 -0000 --8G1nIWD3RY794FAy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:44:07PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > Josh, Lars, >=20 > After looking over this a little closer, I'm totally lost at why these > PRs were filed. >=20 > -p is listed in the manual page as a historic and deprecated option. > -P is listed in the manual page as obsolete. >=20 > I can understand removing them both from the usage message, however > they seem to be documented fine in the manual page (as obsolete). >=20 > Currently I have an email in to murray and bmah about this, and > my personal opinion is that the manual page is fine. >=20 > Any opinions on just removing the -P and -p option from the code > and leaving the manual page as is? What do the other -doc committers > think about this? >=20 Apparently mbr removed ISO support from the code a while ago (which didn't work anyway) and these are leftovers. It's not fatal if this stays in, but as it's something that isn't even implemented anymore, it would be nice to be thrown out. - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --8G1nIWD3RY794FAy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+uuXtbHYXjKDtmC0RApKhAJ42CLIHZ2WEzJwx4lfRNcylzL49NwCcDLyU ThWVYAF1yPWgFviDR0wZVcM= =aFlf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8G1nIWD3RY794FAy--