From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Oct  1 14:42:37 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA29018
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 14:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA29008;
          Tue, 1 Oct 1996 14:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA00441; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 23:41:54 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org,
        greywolf@siva.captech.com, kpneal@pobox.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        tech-kern@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: VPS mailing list, BSD interest? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 01 Oct 1996 14:31:09 PDT."
             <199610012131.OAA02509@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 1996 23:41:53 +0200
Message-ID: <439.844206113@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199610012131.OAA02509@phaeton.artisoft.com>, Terry Lambert writes:
>
>In other words, there is no additional stacking overhead after device
>instantiation for linearly mapped devices, and no additional overhead
>beyond what we would encounter anyway for non-linear devices (like
>CCD, LVM, and/or media perfection devices).
>
>Pretty obvious, actually.

For once I find myself in agreement with Terry.

Better go to bed RIGHT NOW!  :-)

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.