From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 19 22:26:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CB35CF; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 22:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A7AC18AC; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 22:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id wn1so2997176obc.4 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:26:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Q5mQfoPh7BcTlPshMSset59ZLqQe493BQyE6UU6R160=; b=LppGx0F9UvDATVH8PQHTqm/oisZEt9ertQD1F5b3+vpSebxFtK1zOUcRbI2pXe8y8w ObtLkmuOIy9iXtOExn5oyP91lg5syV9+/uLEC4sj1eizGYoDicjHUGY+4jOtAtp0IsHL YfVGoUfsZnVOgdSyKl/te9luRh2tksCel2CDrRua1jlkHz3w8uHmmyllXV0ma15u2U2J q+f253tJa8W0XD2VrXQsE+4KfNbUUldvAT41gJdT3ER0Vh8RmLOXTW1PEnxajwWZpic/ Bh4vNe5WTYfIT1/EisoMqT1Ou0KYjX31B4tBGvFPI5BcImmagTgjzZo0l2qUXt3PHpZH K15A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.47.196 with SMTP id f4mr3546810obn.50.1397946361843; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.170.4 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:26:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5352B889.9050608@freebsd.org> References: <28234312-7982-49F5-83FD-865649AA9CCB@ultra-secure.de> <1397850220.58880.16.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <7FAD7618-593D-4797-9EE9-BA36A87CE79B@ultra-secure.de> <5352B889.9050608@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:26:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What happened with the GlusterFS port? From: Outback Dingo To: Julian Elischer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 22:26:02 -0000 On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Julian Elischer wrote= : > On 4/19/14, 4:43 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> Am 18.04.2014 um 21:51 schrieb Outback Dingo : >> >> >>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sean Bruno >>> wrote: >>> On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 21:30 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> does anybody know where the effort to port GluserFS to FreeBSD went? >>>> >>>> There=E2=80=99s this (very) outdated wiki-page: >>>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/GlusterFS >>>> >>>> and there=E2=80=99s the SoC project: >>>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2013/GlusterFSport >>>> >>>> But nothing seems to have happened after it was finished. >>>> >>> >>> The port made decent progress over the GSOC period, but no, it never >>> gained any traction to end up in the ports collection. >>> >>> >>> >> That is very unfortunate. >> >> >> >> not to hijack the thread but, glusters ancient, use riak-cs, or swift, >>> or port leofs >>> >>> >> >> Currently, the unavailability of GlusterFS in FreeBSD (vs. the >> availability in Linux) is sort of a deal-breaker for some projects here. >> >> There are, regrettably, a large number of legacy applications the rely o= n >> a traditional filesystem. >> An equally large number of customers continue to rely on these same >> applications, for the foreseeable future (and they pay us to run the stu= ff). >> Traditionally, I would have just suggested a ZFS NFS fileserver - but it >> adds a single point of failure, manual failover with ZFS sends/HAST etc. >> > > hey check out panzura's product.. (disclaimer: I work there) > >> >> Shameless plug...... its not Free either......... !!!! > GlusterFS would eliminate this (in situations where the customer needs a >> number of servers anyway). >> >> I guess, it won=E2=80=99t happen until somebody is paid to do it (SoC so= rt of >> proofed that) - directly or indirectly. >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >