From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Feb 12 11:47:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA25777 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:47:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA25771 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:47:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com) Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA29096; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:47:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:47:24 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Eric Fagan Message-Id: <199902121947.LAA29096@kithrup.com> To: grog@lemis.com, tas@stephens.org Subject: Re: BSD/OS Emulation Status? Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199902121916.TAA09731@stephens.ml.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >With the addition of Linux compatibility, BSD/OS has obviously got some >way of distinguishing its ELF binaries from Linux ones, but I've no idea >how it does this, or if there's any similarity to FreeBSD's branding >scheme. I asked a friend at bsdi, and he said "we use Linux' branding method." I let him know just where this branding thing originated. :) Their brand is "BSD/OS", not surprisingly. Sean. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message