Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:39:00 +0100 (BST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Matthew Fleming <matthew.fleming@isilon.com>
Cc:        mlaier@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Loading ng_socket at runtime?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0907301034300.29894@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <06D5F9F6F655AD4C92E28B662F7F853E02F6F4BC@seaxch09.desktop.isilon.com>
References:  <06D5F9F6F655AD4C92E28B662F7F853E02F6F4BC@seaxch09.desktop.isilon.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Matthew Fleming wrote:

> I'm doing a migration from releng/6.1 to stable/7, and one of the many new 
> things is that I get a warning when doing things with ng_socket that didn't 
> used to happen.
>
> WARNING: attempt to net_add_domain(netgraph) after domainfinalize()

I've wondered about these warnings also, and am not sure they're justified -- 
any protocol loading after domainfinalize() should expect that timers are 
already started, etc, and loadable protocols are clearly desirable.

> - ignore the warning (usually a bad idea...)

Probably remove the warning.  Some more synchronization is likely required in 
domain registration than is currently there -- on the other hand, it's 
probably not a big issue that it's missing as write operations on the domain 
list are conservative and extremely rare.

I've CC'd Max Laier, who added the warnings -- perhaps he could lend some 
insight into the types of problems he anticipated.  The main one I'm aware of 
is that mutating the domain list on a live system is risky because it's not 
well-synchronized -- however, adding domains should be pretty safe in 
practice.

Robert



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0907301034300.29894>