From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 5 14:44:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD351065676 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895AE8FC1A for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so1147775wib.13 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:44:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jEEUGKFyEuUliWsgOIVgjdB6pV4r/YfyvNQD3QPb6tU=; b=FAqCGT0KgMRrHPGk1ALiFJnxKYfeK8YD6SemXW+GfqrIsYB7tsZANlSj/YDo/kyO85 Lmc7LQcqGyUeG3KZj5W3ar7KkSBn8k39Qi6NNFff2QZMGXpsoqUuwRnEOFHsFU1EjiWG BpZ3YPW1piXpDCgwYzyHwDpDEOjIKhzsrF/ec= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=jEEUGKFyEuUliWsgOIVgjdB6pV4r/YfyvNQD3QPb6tU=; b=TSfouLuGEzmZTFGIPCSdRqT9P74idhoNbj7Da6aQd17Z09Jm10ibLIkwwphJysVWH1 OUCJtPLRQTSM5Lrgo7PWDQL+Vgxfqp0uMEKwhHrsg+m0MnWeOMeWh8orPmh+tfpjzUsu XpJQS8IguKsGxgrXIl73zVBIhq5xlY/QXJtyFAVQQl9NaHMdPNmBlAfakkxkQQylB6ko GBf/caFO7Up+XlJ6i+BIvfyubNJhqWxJBr5V6AaTYPmhsVdpCp6Ki1Z5QAEuGPhg1MPS mFu3FBTqn4zYG9rpOq3CDXauwg2O/YPBwUhMkR1X+AClUpB1JipxfsZ2iFzFQU7EoznB +DBA== Received: by 10.216.136.131 with SMTP id w3mr1921243wei.15.1333637088638; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:44:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.63.4 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 07:44:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F7CA124.8080401@freebsd.org> <201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:44:18 -0400 Message-ID: To: John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmx7mkLU0CTbW32lbHiztKUkCyNcWHlyJJcg6FEVwYkBcwixAL11oodlg1pdVOvEfulgtbb Cc: Yuri , hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:44:51 -0000 On 5 April 2012 10:06, John Baldwin wrote: > In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. =C2=A0My = patch > actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that. Yay! Can you please roll a new tarball and host in ~/public_distfiles or something of a similar nature? That way we could just point the port at the distfile and we don't have to maintain a seperate patchfile in the ports tree. --=20 Eitan Adler