Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:44:18 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmYZRmXv%2B9a2AOR%2BXg-MXo0D96QXDzqFzmPjFE3xGqt5A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F7CA124.8080401@freebsd.org> <CAF6rxg=QHBKUwWEUO2JRP1hYcDVfg4pM_4BTO6jPu1FmPeWDxA@mail.gmail.com> <201204051006.11598.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5 April 2012 10:06, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. =C2=A0My = patch > actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that. Yay! Can you please roll a new tarball and host in ~/public_distfiles or something of a similar nature? That way we could just point the port at the distfile and we don't have to maintain a seperate patchfile in the ports tree. --=20 Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmYZRmXv%2B9a2AOR%2BXg-MXo0D96QXDzqFzmPjFE3xGqt5A>