From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 24 12:48:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from tkc.att.ne.jp (tkc.att.ne.jp [165.76.16.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCD637B479 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from work.mzaki.nom (242.pool7.ipctokyo.att.ne.jp [165.76.45.242]) by tkc.att.ne.jp (8.8.8+Spin/3.6W-CONS(10/06/00)) id EAA23537; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 04:48:15 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 04:48:14 +0900 Message-ID: <86zojudnr5.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp> From: Motomichi Matsuzaki To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "make release" breakage - dokern.sh patch 2 In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:15:09 -0700" <20001024121509.I17729@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20001024143644.A52958@bsdwins.com> <20001024121509.I17729@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by WEMI 1.13.7 - "Shimada") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi. At Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:15:09 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > Other candidates I've been pointed to include the removal of > > /boot/boot[12] and NFS > IMO NFS needs to stay. It is *very* useful to many (including me). I vote for 'remove NFS away'. Yes, there are many people using NFS install, but it is site-specific. There are no services distributing FreeBSD via NFS in public. In such site-specific situation, you can make your *specific* floppies with NFS and without INET6 or some. IMHO, making install-floppies should be more easy. -- Motomichi Matsuzaki Dept. of Biological Sciences, Grad. School of Science, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message