From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  7 07:59:05 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DCD16A41F;
	Wed,  7 Dec 2005 07:59:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8043743D5C;
	Wed,  7 Dec 2005 07:59:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D452082;
	Wed,  7 Dec 2005 08:58:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Learn: ham
X-Spam-Score: -3.3/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68902080;
	Wed,  7 Dec 2005 08:58:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id A7E3B33C1D; Wed,  7 Dec 2005 08:58:58 +0100 (CET)
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
References: <43938F61.1050202@terranova.net>
	<4393F60E.2040106@shapeshifter.se> <86mzjflc97.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<439495B1.5060305@shapeshifter.se> <861x0qmuen.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<43956ADF.4050504@shapeshifter.se> <86slt6lb9s.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<4395A265.8080006@root.org> <86d5k9eric.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<868xuxer6f.fsf@xps.des.no> <43965CB2.5000707@root.org>
From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:58:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <43965CB2.5000707@root.org> (Nate Lawson's message of "Wed, 07
	Dec 2005 12:53:22 +0900")
Message-ID: <86u0dluym5.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: njl@freebsd.org, Fredrik Lindberg <fli+freebsd-current@shapeshifter.se>,
	Travis Mikalson <bofh@terranova.net>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: powerd
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:59:05 -0000

Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
> Both a) and b) are not applicable.  The goal of those stats is to
> assist with profiling various algorithms.  [...]

I agree that b) doesn't apply if this is only meant to be used under
controlled conditions, but a) definitely applies.

> I'll make sure the signal handling is cleaned up when I commit it.

Already done in my patch.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no