From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 27 5:11:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C3E37B7CA; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 05:11:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13HmTy-000Gah-00; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:09:46 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: brian@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: if_tun.ko seems broken In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:37:11 +0200." <263.964683431@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:09:46 +0200 Message-ID: <63773.964699786@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:37:11 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > ifconfig tun0 inet 10.0.0.1 > > I think you are seing the "interesting" side effect of the BSD > concept of "POINT2POINT" lines. I think that's anotehr issue. Once I'd read 0 bytes from /dev/tun0 with dd(1), I was able to do ifconfig tun0 inet 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 which is actually what I wanted. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message