From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 31 14:59:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BD237B401 for ; Sat, 31 May 2003 14:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gicco.homeip.net (dclient80-218-76-226.hispeed.ch [80.218.76.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B13843F3F for ; Sat, 31 May 2003 14:59:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from localhost.here (idefix@gicco.homeip.net [127.0.0.1]) by gicco.homeip.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4VLxAUh014481 for ; Sat, 31 May 2003 23:59:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: (from idefix@localhost) by localhost.here (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h4VLxA2U014480 for freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org; Sat, 31 May 2003 23:59:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.here: idefix set sender to hampi@rootshell.be using -f Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 23:59:09 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030531215909.GA14431@gicco.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org References: <20030529211335.GA1362@gicco.homeip.net> <1054243227.317.58.camel@gyros> <20030530085935.594cf698.hscholz@raisdorf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030530085935.594cf698.hscholz@raisdorf.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: vumeter X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 21:59:14 -0000 On May 30 at 08:59, Hendrik Scholz spoke: > > > Is there another vumeter with a time axis? > > Try audio/extace from the ports. Hi Hendrik, extace is nice. But in my case a little overkill. The scope mode is probably closest to what I'm looking for. But the time axis should be much less detailed but for a longer period (some 5 seconds). Also it should occupy less screen space, similar like gkrellm. -Hanspeter