From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 17 16:31:20 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA24261 for security-outgoing; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 16:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA24254 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 16:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msmith@localhost by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id IAA10788; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 08:53:52 +0930 From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199604172323.IAA10788@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: X To: tbalfe@tioga.com (Thomas J Balfe) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 08:53:52 +0930 (CST) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Thomas J Balfe" at Apr 17, 96 01:20:05 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Thomas J Balfe stands accused of saying: > > Is it safer to run xdmcp or rexecd? I want to have some of my > machintoshes have access to a machine of mine for X. I am assuming that > rsh is the wrong way to go about it. Correct. xdmcp is good. > Thomas J Balfe tbalfe@tioga.com -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[