From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 4 14:07:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485341065670 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DF78FC15 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n74E7jAh024540 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:07:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:07:45 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200908041407.n74E7jc3024539@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: is upgrade of devel/lib{tool, tldl}15 to devel/lib{tool, tldl}22 worth it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:07:51 -0000 I see that /usr/ports/UPDATING describes an upgrade of devel/libtool15 and devel/libtldl15 to devel/libtool22 and devel/libtldl22, respectively. Is this a good enough thing to do to justify the probable misery and risk of disaster that would be necessary to get through it? If so, I'll give it a shot. OTOH, I dread going through a trial like the perl5.8 to perl5.10 upgrade, which was really a pretty awful experience. Has anyone done this new upgrade and survived yet? Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * **********************************************************************