From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 23 9:19: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from voi.aagh.net (pc1-hart4-0-cust168.mid.cable.ntl.com [62.254.84.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B3A37B405 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16ICH5-0001my-00 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 17:18:59 +0000 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 17:18:59 +0000 From: Thomas Hurst To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spam Message-ID: <20011223171859.GA6702@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20011222225555.G62982-100000@meta.lo-res.org> <200112230948.fBN9mKS06955@blackbox.pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200112230948.fBN9mKS06955@blackbox.pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Organization: Not much. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/4.5-PRERELEASE (i386) X-Uptime: 5:16PM up 3 days, 2:01, 1 user, load averages: 1.99, 1.97, 1.92 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * mikem (mike_makonnen@yahoo.com) wrote: > I don't think the effort is worth the reward. If the frequency > increases, then the issue should be revisited. > > If we do decide this problem merits action... How about filtering list messages through spamassassin? Anything that matches can get bounced so false positivies get noticed and spammers remove it from the list cos it appears inactive. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - freaky@aagh.net - http://www.aagh.net/ - Artistic ventures highlighted. Rob a museum. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message