From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 4 13:56:15 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA02303 for current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA02233 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eel.dataplex.net by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA20172 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:54:28 -0700 Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod [208.2.87.4]) by eel.dataplex.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA05678; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:45:37 -0500 X-Sender: rkw@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:45:47 -0500 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure Cc: terry@lambert.org, current@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I think I'm coming around to the best "solution" of all to this, at >least from my personal perspective, and that's to do nothing and leave >-current exactly as it is. > >I'm tired out just talking about it now. :-) As usual, the "powers that be" refuse to either make changes or allow others to do so. I described in detail an exact methodology which would at least allow us to test the assertions that "there is no problem". I even offered to coordinate the changes. However, since I'm not one of the "anointed few"...... The status quo wins again. :-( I'm afraid I'll have to side with Terry. (January or February ?)