From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 3 18:34:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00BA106566C; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC208FC15; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q63IYIr2093485; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:34:18 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q63IYIDi093482; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:34:18 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:34:15 +0000 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: "Hartmann, O." Message-ID: <20120703183415.GB3379@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FF2B457.9030505@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FF2B457.9030505@zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Sayetsky Anton , FreeBSD Current , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:34:18 -0000 --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > >=20 >=20 >=20 > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). >=20 > devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so > it doesn't need to be installed explicitely. >=20 > I saw a patch flushed in yesterday, submitted by bapt@. This patch also > installs LLVM/CLANG from the ports - with ASSERTS deactivated. >=20 > I have on both systems, FreeBSD 9 and 10, LLVM/CLANG 3.1 as the standard > backend compiler, I guess this version has the suspected ASSERTS activate= d. >=20 > Why another LLVM port? We already have LLVM/CLANG in the base system (9 > and 19). If the ASSERTS proble is the cause for breaks reported on the > list and elsewhere on the net, why isn't the maintainer still stuck on > the "old" version? >=20 > I just managed it to install the prior version on broken systems and was > really lucky having LibreOffice working again. But the other day I was > bothered by the next non-working version and now I have lots of > notebooks remaining with NO LibreOffice on FBSD 9-STABLE. >=20 > This is not what I expect from quality securing! It is simply a mess and > definitely another reason and point for the thread "Why NOT using FreeBSD= ". >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" sure libreoffice is so easy to port... /me officially gives up with that libreoffice port, open for new volunteers= =20 bapt --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/zOycACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExBHQCggmOiuR0A9uEM+/hDxMMPDTTk gkcAoIj5OHgv4FXnwAMhlXCMr4udV3pg =h0Wf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI--