From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Feb 11  8:21:47 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C6B47E7
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:21:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA46673;
	Fri, 11 Feb 2000 11:21:25 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 11:21:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200002111621.LAA46673@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>,
	Stephen Macmanus <stephenm@windriver.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Path MTU discovery cutoff
In-Reply-To: <38A38BEA.146E6526@softweyr.com>
References: <200002102308.PAA18465@brisbane.wrs.com>
	<200002110146.UAA44355@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
	<38A38BEA.146E6526@softweyr.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 21:11:22 -0700, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> said:

> Is this a candidate for a sysctl knob?  sys.net.inet.ip.minmtu, with
> a default value of 296, so we can be fully RFC compliant and yet
> sensible?

No skin off my back...

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message