From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 23 02:48:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D758716A4CE for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:48:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web60007.mail.yahoo.com (web60007.mail.yahoo.com [216.109.116.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F94243D48 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phred1975@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 88997 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Apr 2005 02:48:54 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=w3kG4ZqduMAFS58UYbkfLL9YXGhwANETenbTLrVXfwo9g3ZlIyqjvExVsPxKiIrlZEeNs4AI8G+PgLV2FT3S4kTFid744Dub4fiJ3XwPJqYip025Mya5LfSDBJHkTCTraKY4QuG32MlgUXIYLAyKTw3mXeM+eqrt7QpAslSWGhs= ; Message-ID: <20050423024854.88995.qmail@web60007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.212.162.248] by web60007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:48:54 PDT Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:48:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Shafron To: Steve Kargl In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3, amd64, k8s pro locked up just now X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:48:56 -0000 --- Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 07:35:47PM -0700, Tom > Shafron wrote: > > My 5.3 amd64 just locked up. Seems to be a > similar > > problem to what Vivek has been describing. The > config > > is: > > > > Tyan k8s pro (SATA version) > > 5.3 Release > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > This could be your problem (although Scott Long > fixes > were for systems with >4 GB memory). > > Since the system is lock-up at the moment, you > may want to take this oportunity to upgrade to > 5.4 RC2 or newer. > I'm kind of nervous about using 5.4 since it's not considered a "Release" version yet and I'm planning on using this for a production machine... that is assuming I can get it working properly ;) Is it the general consensus that 5.4 RC2 is more stable than 5.3 (who cares if 5.3 is "release" if it locks up right...) and could be used in a production box? Or is this a bad idea...? As of now I'm definitely not comfortable with using this 5.3 box in production... Thanks, Tom __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com