From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  1 02:54:24 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE796106566C;
	Tue,  1 Jun 2010 02:54:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.212.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCF58FC12;
	Tue,  1 Jun 2010 02:54:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so2446221vws.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 31 May 2010 19:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
	:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=w4adjjfy838ovsxRLdiNezVbfbiK/yIdpbUESu9ihao=;
	b=Mdqoq+Ns4mL1LyJiwfa8eYVcwvWMqo89dzt4sjK+MdeFQzbd+Ia5cw7STwzuy6TFuT
	RBXkYAjl4JyZlN5D5wvW+nEd8p/QoZ/YygbyVxotLzc/HL78Aq1HJEjW4J1qhLvC0N5r
	kHEJnoYr0Tj4XKaIHy2++vGaP5wH78TMtd8ZA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=X2Qpvpdcvv5BMzEOSHIUOQQ43QMyTIZn3hfWfVFJFA38zj6S7PT+dZrv2ic3SACPTj
	iBWCYg8Rl9GDWAlnDH36m+lccG89eGD2NY2gUCbg09I5JkA/XJ8xKuHmBMXueeH3S0tV
	Q8vYjn13xTwpMcPyGs2aayV2zWGrZymRKkQGM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.217.144 with SMTP id hm16mr822022qcb.113.1275360862965; 
	Mon, 31 May 2010 19:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.233.74 with HTTP; Mon, 31 May 2010 19:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C04759B.4080306@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org>
	<20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org>
	<4C04456D.7080408@jrv.org> <4C04587E.70800@freebsd.org>
	<4C04759B.4080306@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:54:22 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinxn8WkdnW6XXCnsxuFoTg-QRLAq49ymhhqCUG4@mail.gmail.com>
From: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>,
	Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org>,
	Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>,
	"James R. Van Artsdalen" <james-freebsd-current@jrv.org>,
	current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to 
	HEAD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:54:24 -0000

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 05/31/10 17:46, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>>
>> On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote:
>> [snip interesting history]
>>
>>> I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows
>>> the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland.
>>
>> Reading through this discussion, I wanted to draw attention to this
>> footnote in James' email. It sounds like a sensible and useful
>> suggestion that would go some way to addressing Kostik's concerns about
>> knowing whether a kernel bug report was related to a gcc or clang built
>> kernel.
>
> +1

I doubt there's anyone that would disagree with this. The only thing
that would be painful is if there were mixed compiles with
applications and triage, but if that was the case the user should
debug their own issue because they'd be mixing and matching toolchains
:/...
Thanks,
-Garrett