From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 6 17:46:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A910A10656C4 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from cell.p6m7g8.net (static-71-178-236-107.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.178.236.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE528FC0A for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.35] (c-98-231-209-125.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.231.209.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by cell.p6m7g8.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o86H8Dmv059587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:08:13 GMT (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Message-ID: <4C851FFA.2090809@p6m7g8.com> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:08:10 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Logvinov References: <4C8476F9.4000306@ish.com.au> <4C84B5F0.9050306@ish.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on cell.p6m7g8.net Cc: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org, Aristedes Maniatis Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:46:10 -0000 On 9/6/2010 6:31 AM, Alexander Logvinov wrote: > Hello! > > 2010/9/6 Aristedes Maniatis: >> So effectively you just removed all the patches from the port directory, >> changed the version and built? > You also should worry about plist changes. > >> Are there a set of functionality tests >> somewhere we can run (other than "does it break anything"?) > I don't know. Exp-run? Anyway Ruby 1.9.2 is mostly compatible with > 1.9.1 according ruby-lang.org site and 1.9 version is not a default > Ruby for FreeBSD. :) > No, rails3 doesn't work with 1.9.1 it sigsevs runtime. Dont' try. I would have if'ed it, but we don't have the logic in place in bsd.ruby.mk to make writing that conditional easy. 1.8.7 > && < 1.9.0|| >= 1.9.2 Which is why my commit message pointed that out. No, ruby 1.2.9 does need some patches. Also, it doesn't seem to self test completely. Stas@ is working on this. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.