From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 15:25:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9790737B401 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from franky.speednet.com.au (franky.speednet.com.au [203.57.65.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6697F43F93 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:25:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andyf@speednet.com.au) Received: from hewey.af.speednet.com.au (hewey.af.speednet.com.au [203.38.96.242])h7BMPdkO044922; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:25:40 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andyf@speednet.com.au) Received: from hewey.af.speednet.com.au (hewey.af.speednet.com.au [172.22.2.17])h7BMPcHT085359; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:25:39 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andyf@speednet.com.au) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:25:38 +1000 (EST) From: Andy Farkas X-X-Sender: andyf@hewey.af.speednet.com.au To: Eriq Lamar In-Reply-To: <200308111816.26818.eqe@cox.net> Message-ID: <20030812082147.A85046-100000@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smp in 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:25:52 -0000 On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote: > Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could > someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using > mp's but not sure which version would be better. Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work*). Stick with 4.8. * for me, sched_ule completely locks up my box, no ping, no keybd. Exact same kernel with sched_4bsd works fine. -- :{ andyf@speednet.com.au Andy Farkas System Administrator Speednet Communications http://www.speednet.com.au/