Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:01:47 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Dmitry Kolosov <onyx@z-up.ru> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! Message-ID: <AANLkTik6irr5rJpeL_WUjg48yh8EqZ3mJOB=_RNNbjuK@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201101210831.23094.onyx@z-up.ru> References: <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan%2BQ172QT@mail.gmail.com> <201101202026.30341.onyx@z-up.ru> <AANLkTimOc%2BE-q5Rba0-qPngPwfUOtec40KL94yXp3112@mail.gmail.com> <201101210831.23094.onyx@z-up.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 January 2011 13:31, Dmitry Kolosov <onyx@z-up.ru> wrote: >> I need to know the output in dmesg of the chipset MAC/PHY revisions. > > This is for dwl-547 pci card > ath1: <Atheros 9280> mem 0xff9b0000-0xff9bffff irq 23 at device 2.0 on pci5 > ath1: AR9280 mac 128.2 RF5133 phy 13.0 Good, that's the same revision as I have; except mine is mini-pci. > and this is for mini-pcie card (inside laptop) > ath0: <Atheros 9285> mem 0xd7100000-0xd710ffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci6 > ath0: AR9285 mac 192.2 RF5133 phy 14.0 I don't have access to one of these, sorry. >> If you have access to older chips (so >> AR5212/AR5213 and earlier) and would like to help debug this then >> please pipe up. > > I think i have one. > > ath0: <Atheros 5212> mem 0xff9f0000-0xff9fffff irq 21 at device 0.0 on pci5 > ath0: [ITHREAD] > ath0: AR2413 mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5 > > I'm using it as an AP now, instead of new dwl-547 (wich is ath1 and not used), > because using ath1 (Atheros 9280) as AP produces many many errors like that: > > ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) > > in any mode and finally it's refuses to work at all. That's why i can't use my > new dwl-547 :( and it just stays for better times. > > Also i think i have another one inside my old laptop HP Pavilion dv6940er. I > will check it out and report back. Thanks. If someone can help me source an AR9285, I can add it to my list of things to test once I get the AR9280 support working. But that's predicated on getting the bugs worked out of the AR5212, AR5416 and AR9160 support. I'll post to -mobile once I've sorted out some of the kinks I'm seeing in the AR9280. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTik6irr5rJpeL_WUjg48yh8EqZ3mJOB=_RNNbjuK>