From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Sep 25 07:46:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA23869 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 07:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.225.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA23827 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 07:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA03722 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:46:17 +0200 Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA10581 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:52:50 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:52:50 +0200 From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199609251452.QAA10581@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: P6 200 performance Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I want to persuade my professor to spend in a P6/200. What is the performance gain over a P5/166? --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de