From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 10:11:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D552D16A4CE for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:11:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B1C43D39 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:11:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i2QIBeEX018024; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:11:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:11:40 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Paul Mather Message-ID: <20040326181140.GA15934@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20031012000509.GA59843@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031012000509.GA59843@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBCS2 regression in FreeBSD 5?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:11:42 -0000 In the last episode (Oct 11), Paul Mather said: > Does anyone know whether the IBCS2 emulation functionality regressed > going from FreeBSD 4 to FreeBSD 5? I ask because I have a > statically-linked SCO binary that works under FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE but > not under FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10 (or a version of 5.1-CURRENT). > > I have ibcs2 and coff modules, and know that IBCS2 at least partially > works. For example, I can run the "hello_world" example program in > /usr/share/examples/ibcs2 as well as some others. But, the program in > question exits immediately with "Abort". Here's what I get when > running the program using ktrace on 5.1: > > 40019 ktrace RET ktrace 0 > 40019 ktrace CALL execve(0xbfbffc7b,0xbfbffb88,0xbfbffb94) > 40019 ktrace NAMI "/usr/adsm/dsmc" And I guess this is a very belated "me too" :) I get the same on 5.2-RELEASE and -current. Paul, did you ever figure out the cause? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com