From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 2 21:43:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA08762 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:43:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA08755 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 1998 21:43:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelh@cet.co.jp) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.8/CET-v2.2) with SMTP id FAA04202; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 05:40:49 GMT Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 14:40:49 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: Nate Williams cc: "John S. Dyson" , Terry Lambert , smp@csn.net, opsys@mail.webspan.net, jak@cetlink.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? In-Reply-To: <199803030519.WAA26387@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Mar 1998, Nate Williams wrote: > > I just found out that ODI's ObjectStore uses Transitive Closure > > calculations to manage objects. They've got one of the fastest object db > > implementations around for this and other reasons. > > Bwah, hah, hah, hah, hah. (Wiping tears from my eyes..) > > You've *GOT* to be kidding, right? ObjectStore is fast for a ObjectDB, > but it's *darn* slow as compared to a relational DB, like Oracle and/or > Informix. > > (We use their Java engine in our product, but speedy it ain't. And the > locking in ObjectStore is useless at best. At least their payware Java > DB has the ability to have more than one 'session' open on a DB at a > time.) You're looking at the PSE which is completely different. You're playing with a one user toy, a nice toy but still a toy. ODI's ObjectStore is faster than Oracle, Sybase, or Informix. Much faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message