Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:59:21 -0600
From:      Chris Csanady <ccsanady@friley-185-205.res.iastate.edu>
Cc:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: High Load cron patches - comments? 
Message-ID:  <199901271759.LAA09274@friley-185-205.res.iastate.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:24:45 CST."

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>
>>
>>:
>>:So this is why pmake drives our system load average up to 8-10 before 
>>:dropping back down to the assigned limit of 5, huh?  Maybe we should
>>:fix the load average computations as John suggested.
>>:
>>:Wes Peters                                                 Softweyr LLC
>>:http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr                      wes@softweyr.com
>>
>>    There's nothing wrong with the load average computation, it's a 1, 5,
>>    and 15 minute pseudo-average just as advertised.  What's wrong are the
>>    programs that try to use it to regulate themselves.
>
>I'm not sure how relevant this is--but the current load average decays
>*very* slowly as compared to other systems.  
>

Ugh..  Exmh has terrible dialog boxes--I was not quite finished.  Anyways,
what I wanted to say was more about the %CPU usage than the load--although
the load seems to decay slowly as well.  It doesn't matter too much, although
in the case of the %CPU usage it seems to mask the current usage with the
delay--it would be nice to have a more direct correlation.  Perhaps
entirely decaying over only a few seconds or so.

Chris



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901271759.LAA09274>