From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 14:04:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E1416A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:04:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6509943D2D; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:04:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rsidd@online.fr) Received: from imp1-a.free.fr (imp1-a.free.fr [213.228.0.79]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B763C4241; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:04:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp1-a.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id ECACB1B9A3; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:03:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from papagena.rockefeller.edu (papagena.rockefeller.edu [129.85.41.71]) by imp1-a.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:03:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1073426627.3ffb30c3d211b@imp1-a.free.fr> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:03:47 +0100 From: Rahul Siddharthan To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?b?U234cmdyYXY=?= References: <20040106200524.GA4224@online.fr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 05:16:27 -0800 cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who's the troll? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:04:14 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Rahul Siddharthan writes: > > [is Bill Huey the troll?] > > Does anybody seriously believe this? Mark Murray, a FreeBSD core team member, publicly said this on an archived and searchable mailing list. That's my problem with it. Nobody cares what random people may have said to one another on IRC, but when someone who can be regarded as a spokesman for the project puts it on record, it's significant. > For my part, while I don't particularly like Bill Huey, I have no > reason to believe that he is the troll, and a couple of good reasons > to believe that he isn't: And I agree totally with all your reasons for believing he isn't. Rahul