From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 27 18:24:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFF4A0E for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com) Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com [69.77.177.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6F48FC0C for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.10.200] (unknown [172.16.10.200]) by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 024C956D54; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:24:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1354040675.3923.3.camel@mjakubik.localdomain> Subject: Re: simple patch for portsnap to use wget From: Mike Jakubik To: Luca Ferrari Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:24:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: 024C956D54.A308A X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:24:45 -0000 On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 08:52 +0100, Luca Ferrari wrote: > Now the question is: should this patch, or better the idea of using > wget or another alike substitute to phttpget, be integrated into the > system? > I've tested it on FreeBSD-9-STABLE. Certainly not with a dependency on wget, which is not part of the base system. Use fetch instead. Thanks.