Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        Chris Casey <chriss@phys.ksu.edu>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ccc
Message-ID:  <15135.42432.130641.662151@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010607090049.D91396@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <20010606114751.A77329@hub.freebsd.org> <Pine.SOL.3.96L.1010606210051.537H-100000@schottky.phys.ksu.edu> <20010607090049.D91396@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

David O'Brien writes:
 > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:55:12AM -0500, Chris Casey wrote:
 > > yay...
 > > Here is what happens with no linux_devtools (kinda long):
 > > 
 > > test@polaris:~> fort -extend_source -arch ev6 -L /compat/linux/usr/lib
 > > -lcxml -o CN1D_2 CrankNicholson.1D.f
 > 
 > Duh, I really cannot read stright this morning.
 > This invocation is most likely wrong, as you don't want the `fort'
 > compiler to use libs in /compat.  [we are still working on the goal of a
 > "native" port, correct?]
 > 
 > > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libfor.so: undefined reference to `getenv@GLIBC_2.0'
 > 
 > You also need to move libfor, libUfor, and libcxml out of the
 > /compat/linux tree and into /lib/lib/compaq (if the fortran installs
 > simular to the C compiler)

And then he's going to have a problem, since they seem to want a bunch
of symbols from glibc.

Is there any way to fake this out:
/compat/linux/usr/lib/libfor.so: undefined reference to
`strchr@GLIBC_2.0'

Or, hmm, I wonder if it could just link to whatever g77 uses for this
purpose.  

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15135.42432.130641.662151>