From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Dec 13 11: 4:46 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 11:04:44 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (placeholder-dcat-1076843399.broadbandoffice.net [64.47.83.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834C937B400 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:04:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id eBDJ2Vx84987; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:02:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:02:31 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200012131902.eBDJ2Vx84987@earth.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Matt Dillon , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: objections to sbuf? References: <35719.976733943@critter> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Considering mailing list archives content, I think the "... fix in :a second" is subject to some debate... : :A good API saves many programming and debugging hours. : :-- :Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 :phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 I grepped through and looked at every sprintf, strcpy, and strcat in the kernel. It is *NOT* a big deal. It is certainly a hellofalot less work to convert those to snprintf/strlcpy/etc then to convert them to sbuf. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message