From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 15 01:46:04 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 405CD37B401; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DEA6143FAF; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ilmar@watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3F8kLrD095721;
	Tue, 15 Apr 2003 04:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from ilmar@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (ilmar@localhost)h3F8kKel095718;
	Tue, 15 Apr 2003 04:46:20 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from ilmar@watson.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: ilmar owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 04:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" <ilmar@watson.org>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030414164215.10656m-100000@fledge.watson.org>
Message-ID: <20030415044318.D92160@fledge.watson.org>
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030414164215.10656m-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: m_pkthdr.label now moved to m_tag
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:46:04 -0000



On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Robert Watson wrote:

> Incidentally, this should also fix a number of WITNESS warnings when
> running with labeled MAC policies because it cleans up some bugs in the
> mapping of mbuf allocator flags to malloc flags, and also more cleanly
> avoids blocking allocations during certain classes of mbuf head copies.

So now it is possible to implement IP packet labeling? Or this feature
would not be included?