From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 24 09:59:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA01515 for current-outgoing; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 09:59:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA01476 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 09:59:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id HAA08267 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 07:29:50 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id JAA13224; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 09:26:53 -0600 From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199611241526.JAA13224@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Subject: Re: more drives in iostat? To: frank@news.via.nl (frank) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 09:26:52 -0600 (CST) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "frank" at Nov 24, 96 09:20:39 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On Sun, 24 Nov 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > >I don't know if this is the right place but I've been wondering > > >why there are only 4 drives showed by iostat. > > Only 4 drives fit in 80 columns. Actually, only 3 fit, because 4 take > > exactly 80 columns and line wrap wastes 1 column. > Hmm.. that is true. But mostly I work with xterms, which I can make as big > as I like. Maybe it could be an option? -w for wide maybe? =) > > Maybe the msps could be skipped for scsi-disks? Ide can only handle 4 anyhow, > and (at least for me) those columns are always 0. > > So maybe it could detect that for sd* it could skip msps and show more > drives? > > I think I'll study the code some more and try to patch it to do that, atleast > for myself I think it would be useful. Hi Frank, I had been meaning for some time now to devise a patch to increase the number of possible columns by one for every extra twelve columns available on the tty. I suspect it would not be too difficult, but instead I have mostly been using systat -io (I like the output a bit better). This however would probably be a welcome enhancement. ... JG