Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:28:59 +0100 (IST) From: Andy Doran <ad@NetBSD.org> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Some ideas on the evolution of -CURRENT Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904301915450.395-100000@vmunix.psn.ie> In-Reply-To: <19990430190706.A11334@bitbox.follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: [About LFS] > even with UVM they haven't gone to a fully merged VM/buffer cache. I You're right, NetBSD doesn't have merged VM/buffer cache just yet. A substantial number of bugs were squashed in the LFS code. Getting diffs of -current LFS code against older RCS versions in the NetBSD tree would probably be useful to see the changes. The person to talk to about this AFAIR, is perseant@NetBSD.org (although don't hold me to this). > NetBSDs work in this area is unlikely to be useful, I think - AFAIK, <sigh> It would be a shame to end up with two quite different implementations. Andy. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9904301915450.395-100000>