From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 5 21:50:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA14763 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 21:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA14750 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 21:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02) id AA25309; Tue, 6 May 1997 00:50:19 -0400 Received: from ponds by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Tue, 6 May 1997 00:50 EDT Received: from lakes.water.net (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.water.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA16934; Mon, 5 May 1997 21:00:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.water.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) id VAA29966; Mon, 5 May 1997 21:07:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 21:07:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199705060107.VAA29966@lakes.water.net> To: ponds!zeta.org.au!bde, ponds!time.cdrom.com!jkh, ponds!barcode.co.il!nadav Subject: Re: /usr/include/ftpio.h is not C++ safe Cc: ponds!FreeBSD.ORG!hackers Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > >Don't pollute new code with the __P() gunge. It just makes it harder > >to read and there are no compilers we need to use which do not accept > >full ANSI prototypes. > > Headers in /usr/include should support K&R since they may be used with > old code. > > Bruce > Yes, I have to agree. Jordan expressed concern about putting __P() macros in the header files he's responsible. Since I should either put-up, or shut-up... Jordan, if you'll mail those to me, I'll be happy to insert them. - Dave R. - p.s. My email should read "ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com" - as is well known; it probably doesn't in your mail reader :-) I'm working on that...