Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:54:02 +0000 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: performance impact of various compression schemes on a zvol Message-ID: <ZS8emljfSTml5uaL@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <ZS8Lt5wGKc6vIRrf@int21h> References: <ZS8Lt5wGKc6vIRrf@int21h>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:33:27PM +0100, void wrote: > What's the perfomance penalty on zvols of compression? > The impact on the host? > > I've searched and cannot find figures. I'm not looking for exact numbers, > more rather would zstd-9 or zstd-6 be better, more suited to zvol (compression > and speed) than lz4, possibly because it's more recent? Or would no > compression at all be 'best'? With compression, it's always going to depend on your data. You might find Rich Ercolani's talk on ZFS compression at last year's OpenZFS DevSummit useful: https://openzfs.org/wiki/OpenZFS_Developer_Summit_2022 -- Brooks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZS8emljfSTml5uaL>