From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 23 08:02:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3995E16A407 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB7B43D58 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:02:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k9N82Q1P051320; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:02:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k9N82O2n051317; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:02:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:02:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Norberto Meijome In-Reply-To: <20061023124655.40608a5e@localhost> Message-ID: <20061023100106.D51068@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <1b6a9c1b5cb2.1b5cb21b6a9c@reyrey.net> <80f4f2b20610221232m192b7d3di7b0ccefce22cd57f@mail.gmail.com> <20061022213937.K11854@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20061023124655.40608a5e@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Jim Stapleton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backing up SOHO server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:02:32 -0000 > > Other alternatives: > - use Bacula for a full fledged backup solution, > - taking the image of the drives containing the OS is definitely a good idea. not for incremental backup, otherwise ok > - rdiff-backup - it's actually REALLY good for incremental backups . I'm using > it with 6GB+ encrypted drives and the saving is quite good (though calculating > the binary difference takes a while). There's a web interface to manage it > remotely,etc. quite nice. if it's managed by "web interface" instead of something normal like command line, it's not good, at least for me.