Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:12:23 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> To: Kage <jirokagey@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gem0 frame error Message-ID: <485FCB67.6040706@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <18034453.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080622122635.GA9784@alchemy.franken.de> <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Kage wrote: | | | Marius Strobl wrote: |> |> With what version of FreeBSD is this? |> |> Marius |> |> _______________________________________________ |> freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list |> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 |> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" |> |> | | | I feel like punching myself. One of the first things you always learn about | systems is to "check the cables". Well, I thought back to the path this | system was connected through and then about the statement that 10BT | half-duplex is uncommon, which struck me again when it was mentioned. So I | checked, and it hit me so hard I slapped my forehead - the test systems I | have here run through an old superstack II....which is limited to 10BT. | Removing this from that switch and then wiring it directly into the good | switch fixed the problem completely. :) fiuu! | | At least I can say I fixed something today. Thanks for the help! | | (It is 7.0-release, by the way) - -- Pietro Cerutti gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEAREKAAYFAkhfy2YACgkQwMJqmJVx946a6gCgvT55Jx0w4Fry8awcQeY0bUQv e5IAnR0zXdRhqZdmhzIE32a5B3FVIHVs =R3ar -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?485FCB67.6040706>