From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 27 08:51:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90958FF; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rewt.org.uk) Received: from hosted.mx.as41113.net (abby.lhr1.as41113.net [91.208.177.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5BC2C31; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.218] (unknown [212.9.98.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rewt.org.uk) by hosted.mx.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cmRYX73N6z11G; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:50:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <524546ED.5010803@rewt.org.uk> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:50:53 +0100 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 ix driver vlan problem References: <20130925164053.GB76403@lath.rinet.ru> <20130925183253.GA1315@lath.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , Jack Vogel , Rumen Telbizov , Jack Vogel , Andree Toonk , Oleg Bulyzhin X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:51:05 -0000 On 25/09/2013 22:10, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Rumen Telbizov wrote: > >> Thanks for the heads-up Oleg, although not the news that I was hoping for. >> >> So what I am going to do right now is reinstall with 9.2 and recompile the >> driver with your patch. >> I'll come back to the list with my results. > > FWIW, we're (with oleg@, yeah) using this patch on stable/9, so you're welcome > to test this on your 9 > > It's supposedly way too late to try to include this fix into 9.2-R, but maybe > it's worth the errata notice... > > This happens on several other intel chipsets as well, no previous errata was ever noted (legacy em, for example) :(