From owner-freebsd-database Wed Nov 22 4:59:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Received: from spammie.svbug.com (mg134-015.ricochet.net [204.179.134.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD8037B4C5 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 04:59:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA00448; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 04:58:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200011221258.EAA00448@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 04:58:27 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: PostgreSQL: Which is Better for MySQL FreeBSD or BSDi? To: rob@ControlQ.com Cc: freebsd-database@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21 Nov, Robert S. Sciuk wrote: > On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Filip Hanik wrote: > >> Any thoughts on PostgreSQL? >> >> Filip >> >> Filip Hanik >> Technical Architect >> Pakana Corporation >> fhanik@pakana.com >> 415-371 9200 ext 3529 > > Yes, and they are all good. PostgreSQL is shaping up into a useful and > scalable dbms. Given the features, the additional setup required is worth > it, and the security is better (flexible). I've had very few problems, > and a great deal of success with it. Msql and Mysql have dropped off the > map as far as I'm concerned. > I disagree. Mysql continues to improve, making sure their product still lives within their definition. If it's not to your liking and PostgreSQL I don't think anyone would have issue with that. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-database" in the body of the message