From owner-freebsd-arch  Sat Jan 27 14:30:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7741F37B400
	for <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f0RMUWO30395;
	Sat, 27 Jan 2001 15:30:35 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com)
Message-Id: <200101272230.f0RMUWO30395@aslan.scsiguy.com>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Proposed change to sbuf semantics 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "27 Jan 2001 23:23:12 +0100."
             <xzpae8cr5wv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 15:30:32 -0700
From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>
>Is this acceptable to you?

I still would need an "sbuf_empty()" type method.  We should
also move the macros into the .c file unless there is some
compelling reason not to.

--
Justin


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message