From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 30 13: 4: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lestat.nas.nasa.gov (lestat.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.50.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A9D14BD8; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 13:03:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thorpej@lestat.nas.nasa.gov) Received: from lestat (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lestat.nas.nasa.gov (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA17973; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 13:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199904302003.NAA17973@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> To: Andy Doran Cc: Eivind Eklund , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Some ideas on the evolution of -CURRENT Reply-To: Jason Thorpe From: Jason Thorpe Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 13:03:55 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:28:59 +0100 (IST) Andy Doran wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > [About LFS] > > > even with UVM they haven't gone to a fully merged VM/buffer cache. I > > You're right, NetBSD doesn't have merged VM/buffer cache just yet. A ...however, Chuck Silvers is doing work on it on a source branch. It's called "UBC", like the unified buffer cache in Tru64 UNIX (formerly Digital UNIX (formerly DEC OSF/1)). -- Jason R. Thorpe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message