From owner-freebsd-security Sun Oct 1 14:11:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F50237B503; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA39188; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:11:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:11:20 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Igor Roshchin Cc: kris@FreeBSD.org, security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: advisory suggestion Message-ID: <20001001141120.A37225@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20001001012524.B9499@freefall.freebsd.org> <200010012109.RAA56369@giganda.komkon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010012109.RAA56369@giganda.komkon.org>; from str@giganda.komkon.org on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:09:22PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:09:22PM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote: > In this case, it was written, that 4.1-STABLE is fixed as of xx.xx.2000 > It's clear that it is fixed in 4.2-RELEASE (whenever it's out) , > but not clear about 4.1.1-RELEASE (you need to compare the dates) > Oh, I see what you meant - I forgot to mention this in the most recent catopen advisory. Sorry - I'll try and remember for the future. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message