Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:14:31 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with DHCLIENT vs 64-bit time_t Message-ID: <xzpllmuep88.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040222191618.GB53610@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> (Marcel Moolenaar's message of "Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:16:18 -0800") References: <p06020407bc533f0ae9d2@[128.113.24.47]> <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <p0602040ebc54c885236b@[128.113.24.47]> <20040215165913.M30161@grogged.dyndns.org> <p06020425bc571c20bcde@[128.113.24.47]> <p06020466bc5e09bf7182@[128.113.24.47]> <xzpznbbwfxb.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040222191618.GB53610@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> writes: > This code is then obviously also broken on amd64 and ia64 [...] yep, if they have 64-bit time_t. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpllmuep88.fsf>