Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:19:35 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 Message-ID: <20120521171935.GB9418@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4FBA6FEB.1000706@quip.cz> References: <CA%2BdUSyp2ztuZdCocnpNCgf-h%2BJO4zMMFEMi_xrm8nbwQ2W9How@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_-UOWSc_suztjLBk0xYu_wu1TSN29Nwarn=nsFRv_TFQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FBA618A.1050707@freebsd.org> <20120521155736.GA79323@DataIX.net> <4FBA6FEB.1000706@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:40:11PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:38:50AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 5/21/12 11:36 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > >>> When would have been a better time? > >>> > >> after it was regression tested? > >> after the security posture (susosin patch) wasn't downgraded? > > > > after a announcement in ports/UPDATING saying it will become the default > > no later than ...XX...XX...XX days "be prepared!" > > I think that the best will be to not have any default "php5" port and > just use php52, php53, php54, php5X, php60... as we have apache20, > apache22, apache24, or mysql50-server, mysql51-server, mysql55-server. > > There is no default apache2 or mysql5-server, so there is no confusion > what is / what will be installed. > > Then it can be choosed in make.conf what version will be used as > default, similar to WITH_MYSQL_VER=51 or APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 > I agree. This does seem like a very sane option. -- - (2^(N-1))
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120521171935.GB9418>