From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Nov 1 22:14:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56AD14F35; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 22:14:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA23976; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 07:13:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Kris Kennaway , security@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSH patches In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Nov 1999 15:13:33 PST." <4789.941498013@localhost> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 07:13:16 +0100 Message-ID: <23974.941523196@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <4789.941498013@localhost>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >In today's environment, ssh is far more useful than telnet or rlogin, >yet we bundle both. But if we cannot put it on the CD anyway, what is the point of using the weaker OpenSSH rather than "the real thing" ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message