Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:52:28 -0600 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bison port Message-ID: <20011210225228.GA1250@leviathan.inethouston.net> In-Reply-To: <20011210141716.A36250@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20011210141048.A36083@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011210171148.K17865-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20011210141716.A36250@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:17:16PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:12:19PM -0500, Joe Clarke wrote: > > According to the Porter's Handbook, PORTEPOCH never goes away. This > > number can never be decremented....unless you rename the port, I guess. > > I believe the assumption there is that the version number will never > surpase some previous value. That is not the case here. > But wouldn't anyone with the PORTEPOCH version installed think they have a newer version than whatever version the non PORTEPOCH version strictly from a pkg_version -v standpoint? -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011210225228.GA1250>