From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 23 13:35:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B8E37B435 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:35:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD51F4B21; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 05:35:19 +0900 (JST) To: Anastasia Leventi-Peetz Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: leventi's message of Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:42:28 +0200. <200108231442.f7NEgSf02282@melle.fkie.fgan.de> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 05:35:19 +0900 Message-ID: <27407.998598919@itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >thank you for writing! >My problem is that, when trying a tunnel between a Linux box to the >FreeBSD box, in the Linux routing table, the nexthop address >is fe80::8007:54. (here 8007:54 is in hexadecimal the IPv4 address of the >FreeBSD box -or sit1 for Linux (endpoint of the tunnel). >This is not a compatible address as you say, but is it possible to have >this address on the FreeBSD box. I think its necessary for the tunnel. it shouldn't really matter. but if you really care, remove fe80:: you have and then add the new one. # ifconfig gif0 up # ifconfig gif0 inet6 fe80:: -alias # ifconfig gif0 inet6 fe80::8007:54 prefixlen 64 alias itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message